Lines of Code
[root]/branches/budaev/papers/paper-welfare
| Author | Changes | Lines of Code | Lines per Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| sbu062 | 214 (100.0%) | 22569 (100.0%) | 105.4 |
more convenient when PAPERS go first in folders and lists
0 lines of code changed in 4 files:
v3.8-post-proof: checking proof, fixed refs
References [120-123] in "The link between decision-making and integrated self" were broken, the visible text was not updated due to probably manual edit, while the reference field code was in fact updated. So references in the list were correct but the ref in the text was wrong. At the proof stage I also deleted reference to MacDonald [122] in the manuscript, [270] in the page proof
908 lines of code changed in 2 files:
v3.8: fixed some refs, added encyclopedia of consciousness for ref. 3
109 lines of code changed in 2 files:
v3.8: reviewer 3, small fix, refs fix `Science (80-. ).` -> `Science`
710 lines of code changed in 2 files:
v3.8: recent section numbering style for RSOC
452 lines of code changed in 2 files:
v3.8: reviewers 1 and 2 fixed comments
967 lines of code changed in 3 files:
use Id tag
508 lines of code changed in 1 file:
added only notes
14 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: added note on Digital Life Norway
373 lines of code changed in 2 files:
test placeholder text 0000 for tag in master ODT document
7 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: svn style for tag added, no text changed
NOTE: there should be no style changes within the $ Revision $ tag for it to be processed as a whole
748 lines of code changed in 2 files:
test keywords: revision tag in Title
28 lines of code changed in 1 file:
test keywords, added revision to properties-comments
465 lines of code changed in 1 file:
test keywords, there should be no formatting changes within the `$Revision XXX$` tag for it to autoupdate
148 lines of code changed in 1 file:
test keywords update
497 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: reformatted svn tag
88 lines of code changed in 2 files:
v3.7: added svn tags in tracked files--fodt and txt--works well with tags
`svn propset svn:keywords "Id Date Revision HeadURL LastChangedDate" paper.*`
489 lines of code changed in 2 files:
test auto-update svn version tag
467 lines of code changed in 1 file:
test keywords in FODT file
513 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.5: added flat XML tracked version, it is produced by default `make` = `make all` command
920 lines of code changed in 1 file:
autogenerate flat XML version for svn version control
12 lines of code changed in 1 file:
added sleep to wait for libreoffice to complete the conversion: needed because libreoffice starts background job
1 lines of code changed in 1 file:
target for fodt conversion
12 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: **weather** fixed
---------------
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:48:29 +0000
> From: Jarl Giske <Jarl.Giske@uib.no>
> To: Sergei Budaev <Sergey.Budaev@uib.no>
> Subject: RE: After the submission
>
> In line 266 you still write weather instead of whether
>
> 😊
2 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: added ref to HPI in fish, as of referee 3
147 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: fix refs to Science
6 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: added emotion papers to avoid impression that no empirical work was done before
126 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: manual fix `Science (80-. ).`
6 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: check references
17 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: small fixes made by Jarl
----------------------
> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:06:45 +0000
> From: Jarl Giske <Jarl.Giske@uib.no>
> To: Sergei Budaev <Sergey.Budaev@uib.no>
> Subject: RE: welfare paper v3.7-r9913
>
> Hi sergey,
> A final read-through from me, with just a few suggstions.
> Jarl
11 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: two new refs added
290 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: fixed Sigrunn's comment that result in renumbering refs
------------------
> Managing these basic needs in complex unpredictable
> environments is a difficult task [202,203].
This is mentioned several times in the introduction…suggest delete
194 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: small changes after re-readig
4 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.7: fixes after Sigrunn r9908 and r9909
48 lines of code changed in 2 files:
v3.5: Sigrunn's part 2
------------
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:53:34 +0000
> From: Sigrunn Eliassen <Sigrunn.Eliassen@uib.no>
> To: Sergei Budaev <Sergey.Budaev@uib.no>
> Cc: Jarl Giske <Jarl.Giske@uib.no>, "Kristiansen, Tore" <torek@hi.no>
> Subject: paper-welfare-v3.5_SE.docx
>
> Sergey,
>
> Sorry for being late with my comments and feedback. Please find my suggestions
> in the two files attached for part 1 - including comments to page 1-4 and
> the other file for the remaining of the ms
>
> sigrunn
35 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.5: Sigrunn's part 1
----------
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:53:34 +0000
> From: Sigrunn Eliassen <Sigrunn.Eliassen@uib.no>
> To: Sergei Budaev <Sergey.Budaev@uib.no>
> Cc: Jarl Giske <Jarl.Giske@uib.no>, "Kristiansen, Tore" <torek@hi.no>
> Subject: paper-welfare-v3.5_SE.docx
>
> Sergey,
>
> Sorry for being late with my comments and feedback. Please find my suggestions
> in the two files attached for part 1 - including comments to page 1-4 and
> the other file for the remaining of the ms
>
> sigrunn
47 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.6: small fix after Tore
-----------------
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:16:54 +0000
> From: "Kristiansen, Tore" <torek@hi.no>
> To: Sergey Budaev <sergey.budaev@uib.no>
> Cc: Jarl Giske <Jarl.Giske@uib.no>, Sigrunn Eliassen <sigrunn.eliassen@uib.no>
> Subject: RE: Welfare paper -- revision for RSOC
>
> Hi Sergey, all
>
> I think the manuscript looks excellent and very well written, and will be
> an eye-opener for why subjective states are important survival mechanisms.
>
> I have not much to add now, but maybe we should say something
> about "motor prediction errors" (did may movement go as
> predicted?https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2018.00524/full
> and maybe most important "reward prediction
> errors" (was the behavior worth the effort?
> https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822%2817%2930266-X)
>
> In the paragraph about signs (about line 130) we could also mention
> "interpretation capacity" and "semiotic freedom"?
>
> "An animal can potentially produce a wide range of responses (including
> ignorance) to any given stimulus depending on its internal model of its
> current state and its surroundings. Signs, like the smell of a predator or
> prey, are stimuli that signify something else than itself [81]. A multitude
> of signs can be found in the environment, some are also sent from the animal
> to other organisms voluntarily or involuntarily, and all organisms live in
> a “semiosphere” of signs (and noise falsely interpreted as signs). It
> is essential for learning and prediction of the future to recognize the
> meaning of important signs among the complex sensory input. This recognition
> or INTERPRETATION CAPCITY (Semiotic freedom) is therefore also essential
> for how RICH THE ANIMAL'S PHENOMENAL WORLD IS and HOW WELL an animal copes
> with its environment, AND will directly impact its welfare IN BOTH POSITIVE
> AND NEGATIVE WAYS[81]." (attached a shorter version of Hoffmeyers theories)
>
> All the best
> Tore
3 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.6: refresh and renumber references, after r9886
267 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.6: added Jarl's figure legend
--------------------
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:39:04 +0000
> Jarl Giske <Jarl.Giske@uib.no> wrote:
>
> What about this one? Modified figure and modified legend.
> As simple as possible....
> We should keep in mind that the paper is about wellbeing,
> and wellbeing is what we need to explain.
> The PPT (first sheet) is also attached so you may play
> with the graphics if you want.
> -j
3 lines of code changed in 1 file:
v3.6: accepted Jarl's changes from r9886 with some modifications
54 lines of code changed in 1 file:
(132 more)